Case study
equity and inclusion, ethics and governance, quality practice, evaluation, partnership working, policy and funding context

Fair Funding: University of Edinburgh Community Grant Scheme

updated on 26 Sep 2024
6 minutes

More than 200 community organisations in the City of Edinburgh, Fife, Lothians and Scottish Borders have been awarded funding from the University of Edinburgh's community grant scheme since it launched in 2017. The University ran a five-year evaluation looking at the holistic impact of the scheme, and the ways in which its processes could be improved. 

This case study focuses on how the evaluation was used to improve the scheme’s delivery, bringing it in line with the latest nationally-recognised principles of Fair Funding for the third sector in Scotland

Group shot of the Edinburgh Rays baseball in playing field, standing/crouching around their logo

The driving forces behind the Community Grant Scheme are the University's Social Responsibility and Sustainability department, and the Communication and Marketing department. The scheme is fully financed from the University’s operating budget. Volunteer Edinburgh, a local third sector organisation, provides representation on the scheme’s panel. The Assistant Principal, Community Relations championed the scheme’s formation.

Purpose

The University of Edinburgh Community Grant Scheme was initially set up to provide an avenue for the University to contribute towards civic engagement and cultural enrichment in the City of Edinburgh, Fife, Lothians, and Scottish Borders. Twice a year the team calls out for applications for grants of up to £5,000 from community-based organisations. The aim is to encourage engagement between these community organisations and the University, which may not happen without the structure of this scheme in place. Through this scheme, the University is able to have a positive social impact whilst also forging meaningful relationships within different communities.

Background

In 2017, The University of Edinburgh launched its first community engagement strategy. During this process, colleagues became aware that a small number of universities in England were running community grant schemes (including Oxford’s small community grant scheme) and that these schemes could provide a useful best practice case for The University of Edinburgh to emulate. 

A small group within the University presented a business case for (1) an annual budget of £50k to make up the community grant funding pot, and (2) part-time posts to support the wider community strategy. The business case included the potential financial and non-financial returns that could be leveraged, such as community benefits through procurement processes and improved community relations. It was also helpful to highlight existing private sector best practice for spending a certain proportion of income on corporate social responsibility activities. The need to visibly adopt sector-leading practice was also important for the University. Over the years there have been key benefits not foreseen in the original business case, notably the extensive network of third-sector relationships that bring much value to the University’s civic activities.

Approach

Grants Panel

A grants panel was assembled to hold the selection process twice a year. The panel is made up of staff from Social Responsibility and Sustainability, Communications and Marketing, representation from the University’s Widening Participation team, Student Representation from Edinburgh University Students’ Association, Development and Alumni, and colleagues from local charity Volunteer Edinburgh to provide a level of external scrutiny. As a result, the panel is made up of a mix of people who are highly knowledgeable on issues from the local sector, including care provision. Currently the panel is made up of nine people, and has changed over the years as people move in and out of roles.
Illustration of a lightbulb

Micro-Grants

The scheme started off funding grants of £5,000, with the selection process being handled by the full panel. However, when the Covid-19 pandemic hit, it became clear that some projects needed faster movement and smaller amounts. As a result, micro-grants for £500 were established, which did not require input from the full panel to be granted.

Citizens Panels

The delivery team are keen to diversify the panel even further, and are exploring the potential of a citizen panel. This would be made up of members of the public who scrutinise the University’s work on civic engagement to provide even stronger links for the University’s social impact.

Resources

The Community Grant Scheme is financed from within The University of Edinburgh’s budget, although the scheme has also received three donations from external organisations. The Director of the Department of Social Responsibility and Sustainability, Dave Gorman, has also enabled other parts of the University to contribute towards the scheme. So, while the baseline budget per year is expected to be around £50,000, the annual funding pot has managed to be closer to £100,000 to date.

Evaluation

From its inception in 2017, more than 300 regional community projects have been supported to a total of £723,000 by the Community Grant Scheme. Two calls are held per year (in spring and autumn), with around 70 applications being received per call; and 22 full grants were funded in the 2023/24 cycle.

 A comprehensive impact of the scheme was undertaken after 5 years, which demonstrates how projects funded by the University map onto UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

140 projects contributed to SDG 3 (good health and wellbeing), over 115 projects contributed to SDG 10 (reduced inequalities), and 44 projects contributed to SDG 11 (sustainable communities and cities).

Data also revealed that, compared to other groups, children and young people were benefiting more from projects that were supported by the scheme. Case studies from funded projects tell stories of the scheme’s impact on family support centres, sensory gardens, surf therapy for trauma recovery, engaging young people in climate change, and inclusive wheelchair rugby. A project involving vulnerable children with emotional difficulties supported them to grow community crops, about which one child exclaimed, “This is better than PE!".

Lessons Learned

Be Explicit to be Fair

There was an assumption by the team responsible for the scheme that it would contribute to positive social impact and building community-University partnerships. In hindsight, the team felt that being more explicit around the scope of what the scheme was meant to fund (aligned with Sustainable Development Goals), would have been fairer to applicants and would have ensured mostly in-scope applications were received. This was addressed within the five-year evaluation report, and now all applications and final project reports are successfully tracked against a selection of 6 Sustainable Development Goals. 

Focus on Relationships

There has been modest progress in maximising the relationships between community organisations and University researchers, academics and other colleagues beyond the Community Team who run the scheme. However, this is an area that is being focused on. The team has found that some organisations who have received a grant have independently formed strong relationships with staff and students across the University.

Expect the Unexpected

The team also highlighted that the range of projects to address challenges that communities were seeking funding for was unexpected. The level of need for essential services e.g. food from organisations has increased rather than reduced. The scheme has operated with awareness of the University’s purpose as a non-statutory body, while pragmatically recognising just how vital the third sector is to the health and wellbeing of local people. 

Legacy

Because a disproportionate amount of grantee projects addressed children and young people (as evidenced in the impact evaluation), the scheme could potentially impact their whole lifespans. This was not an explicit aim but is noteworthy and gratifying.

Another important legacy is the relationships forged between the University and community groups; some which might not have happened if not for this scheme.

The scheme is set to remain in place, so its legacy will continue to be made, in addition to the catalogue of incredible projects supported thus far.

Find out more and get in touch

To find out more about the Community Grants Scheme, contact: sarah.anderson@ed.ac.uk or visit the project website: